Back to the demo siteFictional demo · invented figures, no real shop or trading data
v3ct0rMillfield Parade price batch 4

Millfield Parade price check, batch 4

We are suggesting changes to one matched half and leaving the other half alone so your own till numbers tell us what happened, rather than us guessing. This week, consider the suggestions in Arm A and the solo section, and leave every Arm B price exactly as it is.

Arm A: consider changing these

These are the suggested first changes. On the cautious basis they are worth about £52 a year in total. That figure is not the price rise multiplied by today's units: VAT comes off first, then the cost of the stock, then the margin on the units we expect to stop selling.

LineTill codeCurrentThis weekSold per day
Pasta spirals small packThis is a first step. A second step may follow after the read.9900000000001£2.51£2.615.25
Still water small packThis is a first step. A second step may follow after the read.9900000000021£0.84£0.893.88
Butter small packThis is a first step. A second step may follow after the read.9900000000016£2.21£2.312.85
Chocolate biscuits small packThis is a first step. A second step may follow after the read.9900000000012£2.67£2.773.92
Apple juice small packThis is a first step. A second step may follow after the read.9900000000008£1.77£1.874.17
Long grain rice small packThis is a first step. A second step may follow after the read.9900000000002£1.62£1.722.43

Arm B: leave these exactly as they are until 3 November 2026

Do not reprice any Arm B line before 3 November 2026.

Arm B is the held comparison. Changing even one of these prices weakens the read. Holding it back leaves about £63 a year on the table for now, on the same cautious basis.

LineTill codeCurrentThis weekSold per day
Fruit sweets small pack9900000000010£1.31Leave unchanged5.53
Tomato soup family pack9900000000019£2.73Leave unchanged5.03
Sparkling water small pack9900000000007£2.80Leave unchanged5.10
Tomato soup small pack9900000000003£1.41Leave unchanged3.88
Sparkling water family pack9900000000023£2.98Leave unchanged2.75
Long grain rice family pack9900000000018£1.70Leave unchanged4.02

Solo lines: change and read separately

Each line here is too large to hide inside an arm, so it gets its own read on 3 November 2026. A suggestion is still the owner's call.

No line is large enough to need a separate read.

What the read can tell us on 3 November 2026

We will compare 56 days before and after the changes. The held arm helps us judge whether the changed arm moved differently from ordinary trading. It does not promise an outcome, and it does not identify customer response before the read.

Arm A before-and-after: 22.50 units per day, about 1,260 units across 56 days, with a noise floor of about ±4.0%. This is the before-and-after floor for this arm, not the threshold for comparing Arm A with Arm B. It cannot tell us what happened on each line.

Arm B before-and-after: 26.31 units per day, about 1,473 units across 56 days, with a noise floor of about ±3.7%. This is the before-and-after floor for this arm, not the threshold for comparing Arm A with Arm B. It cannot tell us what happened on each line.

Arm A against Arm B: the combined one-standard-error comparison floor is about ±5.4%. About ±10.6% is a rough 95% reference before overdispersion or department confounding, not a conclusion threshold. We will read the result with those limits rather than treating one standard error as proof.

Residual arm difference: yearly value 17.5%; daily units 14.5%; department coverage 4 in Arm A and 3 in Arm B, with 3 departments shared. These are recorded limits, not hidden precision.

Slower lines saved for later

0 lines fell below one unit per day. Together their yearly gap is £0 at current volumes, before any customer response. They are worth doing later and are not being ignored. An eight-week read is too noisy to judge them honestly in this batch. At the boundary, one sale a day gives 56 units in the window and about ±18.9% noise on a before-and-after ratio, so it cannot support a line-level conclusion.

Warnings kept out of the experiment

0 lines, with a yearly gap of £0 at current volumes, before any customer response, carry a different-product warning. They are not safe to put into this experiment until the matched names have been checked, so they are disclosed here but not allocated to either arm.